[PLNI]: "...and this is what the SEC said about Plasticon...."
.
.
In a completely false statement, a poster on the IHUB message boards claims that he talked to the SEC regadring PLNI and that the SEC "confirmed PLNI is working on completing their audit and it was delayed due to aquisitions, share structure and etc".
He also stated that the SEC told him that the latest PLNI press release was "more than likely correct". This is another false statement by this poster.
The SEC doesn't make these type of comments about publicly traded companies to anyone......period.
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=9137657
Posted by: KG4
In reply to: supervalue who wrote msg# 4203
Date:1/5/2006 7:08:37 PMPost #of 4370
Dont even waste your time trying to explain to this nut why the audit was delayed.....The guy has an agenda which is to claim he is long to try and gain trust and then bash and mislead to bring PLNI down....The company, their PR Firm and yes, even the SEC, if you would bother to call...have confirmed PLNI is working on completing their audit and it was delayed due to aquisitions, share structure and etc....the SEC is pretty tight lipped and wont say much, but I pretty much put this in their face.....I put the last PR in their face and they said they could not comment...after further 'talking', I pretty much was told in not so many words that the pr was more then likely correct and if it wasn't, they ( the SEC) would have acted by now as that is pretty bad...putting out public PR's saying audit is close to sec approval...all the pro mold and semco news...buying equipment, share buy backs and etc...if not true, the sec is well aware of plni and would have slammed them by now, imo.....
I am looking for positive news in jan/feb 06 and will laugh at people like mr. shorts who obviously never went to class when they were teaching investing 101...but, maybe he can take some classes at __________, if he he can fit them in...after all, big bubba should keep him occupied Imao
_________________________________________________
.
In a completely false statement, a poster on the IHUB message boards claims that he talked to the SEC regadring PLNI and that the SEC "confirmed PLNI is working on completing their audit and it was delayed due to aquisitions, share structure and etc".
He also stated that the SEC told him that the latest PLNI press release was "more than likely correct". This is another false statement by this poster.
The SEC doesn't make these type of comments about publicly traded companies to anyone......period.
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=9137657
Posted by: KG4
In reply to: supervalue who wrote msg# 4203
Date:1/5/2006 7:08:37 PMPost #of 4370
Dont even waste your time trying to explain to this nut why the audit was delayed.....The guy has an agenda which is to claim he is long to try and gain trust and then bash and mislead to bring PLNI down....The company, their PR Firm and yes, even the SEC, if you would bother to call...have confirmed PLNI is working on completing their audit and it was delayed due to aquisitions, share structure and etc....the SEC is pretty tight lipped and wont say much, but I pretty much put this in their face.....I put the last PR in their face and they said they could not comment...after further 'talking', I pretty much was told in not so many words that the pr was more then likely correct and if it wasn't, they ( the SEC) would have acted by now as that is pretty bad...putting out public PR's saying audit is close to sec approval...all the pro mold and semco news...buying equipment, share buy backs and etc...if not true, the sec is well aware of plni and would have slammed them by now, imo.....
I am looking for positive news in jan/feb 06 and will laugh at people like mr. shorts who obviously never went to class when they were teaching investing 101...but, maybe he can take some classes at __________, if he he can fit them in...after all, big bubba should keep him occupied Imao
_________________________________________________
posted by the_worm06 | 1/07/2006 10:13:00 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home