[GCHR]: Save these Posts
.
.
Save these posts from the Silicon Investor message board for when further research by the_worm06 Research Department is published on GCHR. These two individuals are the moderators for the GCHR Ihub message board. jmhollen is the moderator for the same board on Silicon Investor. It is unfortunate that these three individuals would pump and hype GCHR without doing the proper due diligence. Very unfortunate for the investors that have been suckered into owning GCHR by these 3 individuals - rrufff, Creede Bighorns and jmhollen - leading to significant losses for innocent investors in the weeks and months to come.
very unfortunate indeed.
post #1
http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=22184971
To: rrufff who wrote (3993)
2/19/2006 10:21:40 PM
From: Creede Bighorns
of 4014
rrufff-
another excellent post. You always seem to be able to get to the heart of things. I think it's very honorable of you to step forth and essentially draw some of the fire from rick and john. I think your intervention has also shown that the "blogger" is only operating out of contempt. He has littered his blog with so many attacks that it has become obvious to me that he's not trying to help follow investors. His bashing is more about personal vendettas. At first, it seemed as though he was just trying to get his DD out in the public eye, and then he was snuffed from communicating. Now it's become clear that actually he is just full of malice towards rick, jm, and now you. This is made clear because he is attacking GCHR essentially because you are in it. He's doing this while disregarding the fact that I'm the moderator of the GCHR thread on IHUB. He has said on his blog that "i'm alright in his book", but then letting his rage drive him to bash a stock on information that is almost a decade old. He doesn't seem to care that he may be hurting me, and many others that he doesn't think about. Of course, ironically, I believe in the case of GCHR he is doing nothing but help, since it is just now being discovered, and it's shareholder base is relatively small. His posting and reposting is no doubt shining the spot light on GCHR like never before. Anyone that takes a look at GCHR will see that they are 100% filing and 100% transparent, and therefore, of high value in such dangerous waters.
GodBless-ND
cris
============================
post #2
http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=22185003
To: Creede Bighorns who wrote (4014)
2/19/2006 10:36:49 PM
From: rrufff
of 4015
Excellent DD Creede per usual. I agree except that I don't think this blogger creates enough attention to draw anyone to or from GCHR. The only reason there was any effect, if any, on PLNI, was because he was cited by some of the bashers.
I do think, that all but the least objective, will now realize that the value of this "research department" is less than nil. He's been exposed as impotent, possibly an NASD violator, and clearly motivated by his own personal embarrassment.
I was semi-joking when I called him a contra-indicator in PLNI, but, interestingly enough, it may very well be true. As others understand that the string of bashing relies on a "research department" that is nothing more than one goofy ancient guy with a vendetta, then the whole charade of bashing falls, absent some real factual data that would need to be verified elsewhere.
I think there's a good chance that his next target may be an immediate buy. But, all kidding aside, discredited by his lack of objectivity, I doubt anyone will ever take him seriously again.
ROFLMAO.
_________________________________________________
.
Save these posts from the Silicon Investor message board for when further research by the_worm06 Research Department is published on GCHR. These two individuals are the moderators for the GCHR Ihub message board. jmhollen is the moderator for the same board on Silicon Investor. It is unfortunate that these three individuals would pump and hype GCHR without doing the proper due diligence. Very unfortunate for the investors that have been suckered into owning GCHR by these 3 individuals - rrufff, Creede Bighorns and jmhollen - leading to significant losses for innocent investors in the weeks and months to come.
very unfortunate indeed.
post #1
http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=22184971
To: rrufff who wrote (3993)
2/19/2006 10:21:40 PM
From: Creede Bighorns
of 4014
rrufff-
another excellent post. You always seem to be able to get to the heart of things. I think it's very honorable of you to step forth and essentially draw some of the fire from rick and john. I think your intervention has also shown that the "blogger" is only operating out of contempt. He has littered his blog with so many attacks that it has become obvious to me that he's not trying to help follow investors. His bashing is more about personal vendettas. At first, it seemed as though he was just trying to get his DD out in the public eye, and then he was snuffed from communicating. Now it's become clear that actually he is just full of malice towards rick, jm, and now you. This is made clear because he is attacking GCHR essentially because you are in it. He's doing this while disregarding the fact that I'm the moderator of the GCHR thread on IHUB. He has said on his blog that "i'm alright in his book", but then letting his rage drive him to bash a stock on information that is almost a decade old. He doesn't seem to care that he may be hurting me, and many others that he doesn't think about. Of course, ironically, I believe in the case of GCHR he is doing nothing but help, since it is just now being discovered, and it's shareholder base is relatively small. His posting and reposting is no doubt shining the spot light on GCHR like never before. Anyone that takes a look at GCHR will see that they are 100% filing and 100% transparent, and therefore, of high value in such dangerous waters.
GodBless-ND
cris
============================
post #2
http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=22185003
To: Creede Bighorns who wrote (4014)
2/19/2006 10:36:49 PM
From: rrufff
of 4015
Excellent DD Creede per usual. I agree except that I don't think this blogger creates enough attention to draw anyone to or from GCHR. The only reason there was any effect, if any, on PLNI, was because he was cited by some of the bashers.
I do think, that all but the least objective, will now realize that the value of this "research department" is less than nil. He's been exposed as impotent, possibly an NASD violator, and clearly motivated by his own personal embarrassment.
I was semi-joking when I called him a contra-indicator in PLNI, but, interestingly enough, it may very well be true. As others understand that the string of bashing relies on a "research department" that is nothing more than one goofy ancient guy with a vendetta, then the whole charade of bashing falls, absent some real factual data that would need to be verified elsewhere.
I think there's a good chance that his next target may be an immediate buy. But, all kidding aside, discredited by his lack of objectivity, I doubt anyone will ever take him seriously again.
ROFLMAO.
_________________________________________________
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home