the_worm06

Thoughts, Comments and Research on Publicly Traded Companies and Internet Stock Message Boards

Tuesday, May 06, 2008

[LBWR]: Promoter Michelle Yahner ("partysasquatch") begins the legal threats

.
It seems that Promoter Michelle Yahner ("partysasquatch") of 6410 Olde York Rd, Parma Heights, Ohio is now suggesting that her co-Promoter Creede Bighorns ("Cris") should begin legal action since it has been brought to the attention on the Internet that Creede Bighorns has been using his employer's assets to promote the stock of Labwire, Inc. (LBWR) on the Internet.

One has to wonder how the Methodist Hospital of Memphis is going to react to this. You would think that the Hospital would have strict guidelines regarding the use of its assets to promote what is turning out to be a potential scam stock. After all, is it possible that the Hospital is now liable to the extent Creede Bighorns is investigated by the SEC or the U.S. Attorneys Office for his promotional activities? How would the Methodist Hospital of Memphis react to subpoenas for inspection of its servers regarding the stock promotional efforts of promoters for LBWR?

What was Promoter Michelle Yahner thinking when she began with the legal threats?


http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=29058529

Posted by: partysasquatch
In reply to: sandintheshorts

who wrote msg# 5524
Date:5/6/2008 9:55:17 AM
Post #5525 of 5528

My opinion is that Creede should go to Human Resources at work and inform them that he has attracted a cyberstalker. He should then inform Lycos about the posts on the worms blog and contact several other cyberstalker sites.

Upon completion, he should consult a lawyer and see what recourse he has and what recourse he can use if his work is contacted.

I think you are involved in this cyberstalking game and you should reconsider helping someone who posts private infomation about non-public individuals and claims that company property is used for non-work purposes.

Consult a lawyer for a full opinion of where you really stand in aiding this cyberstalker because first amendment does not apply to what he is doing to individual posters.

Do you understand my advice?

Party





__________________________________________

1 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

67

(details to follow)

GB-ND
c. Bighorns

1:54 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home