the_worm06

Thoughts, Comments and Research on Publicly Traded Companies and Internet Stock Message Boards

Monday, February 27, 2006

[PLNI] Mr. Paul Davis and the truth about his PLNI ownership

.
.
It seems that Mr. Paul Davis has recently been caught with more false statements regarding his ownership of PLNI:


http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=22207814


It seems one of Mr. Paul Davis' associates, jmhollen, was also caught with false statements about his PLNI ownership:


http://snipurl.com/kwrs



What is the true relationship between Mr. Paul Davis and the promoter jmhollen?

http://snipurl.com/mui9

http://snipurl.com/mui8






_________________________________________________

[IPMG]: Plagiarism and the pumping and hyping of a stock

.
.
It seems that the same crew of "true longs" of PLNI continue with the pumping and hyping of IPMG, even after they found out that the CEO comments of an IPMG November 2005 press release were plagiarized from a quote of a CEO in a May 2005 report on a totally different company, EVOGF.


The "true long" crew and their comments on Silicon Investor:

rrm_bcnu
rrufff
KG4
pqrs
Creede Bighorns
iwannaride0
http://snipurl.com/mz2m


The IPMG November press release which plagiarized another company's CEO's comments is shown below in Exhibit A.



The EVOGF May 2005 report that was plagiarized:
http://snipurl.com/mz2o


The paragraph from IPMG:

"Brian Robertson, IPMG's President, stated that, "We are searching for world-class ore bodies in districts that already host world-class deposits. One has a higher chance of intersecting economic mineralization by getting onto structural or geological trends within those districts. IPMG is focusing on secondary discoveries, extending from a proven ore deposit or past-producing mine. This philosophy sums up two world-class mineral deposits that IPMG is currently in the due diligence evaluation stages on." "



The paragraph from EVOGF:

"“We look for world class ore bodies in districts which already have world class deposits,” announced Dr. Lawrence Dick, CEO of Evolving Gold (US symbol EVOGF) -- http://www.evolvinggold.com/. “One has a higher chance of intersecting economic mineralization by getting onto structural or geological trends within those districts.” That philosophy sums up two new projects recently optioned by Evolving Gold’s veteran management team. Their key is to focus on a secondary high grade discovery, which extends from a proven deposit or an operating mine. "




Exhibit A

International Precious Mineral Group Announces New Strategic Focus on World-Class Ore Deposits; Currently Evaluating Several Potential Acquisitions

KEN CARYL RANCH, Colo., Nov 16, 2005 (PRIMEZONE via COMTEX) -- International Precious Minerals Group, Inc. (Pink Sheets:IPMG) is pleased to announce that the Company's Board of Directors has unanimously adopted a new strategic focus for the Company. Effective immediately, IPMG's geologists will focus their efforts on identifying, acquiring, exploring and developing "world-class" ore deposits.

World-class ore deposits are the largest 10% of a given deposit type as ordered by metal content. These deposits dominate the supply of many metals and are, therefore, of great importance. For example, a world-class gold deposit would contain several million ounces of gold, and a world-class copper deposit, in excess of one billion pounds of copper.
To support this effort, IPMG has recently developed strategic alliances that significantly enhance the Company's exploration culture. Additionally, the Company has acquired private mineral deposit libraries and exploration databases, giving it access of one of the most extensive geoscientific databases in the industry.


Brian Robertson, IPMG's President, stated that, "We are searching for world-class ore bodies in districts that already host world-class deposits. One has a higher chance of intersecting economic mineralization by getting onto structural or geological trends within those districts. IPMG is focusing on secondary discoveries, extending from a proven ore deposit or past-producing mine. This philosophy sums up two world-class mineral deposits that IPMG is currently in the due diligence evaluation stages on."

IPMG consultants are carefully studying the overall commodities markets, looking at commodities such as titanium and tungsten where there are indications of potential near-term supply shortfalls. The Company intends to acquire one or more world-class deposits before the targeted commodities experience run-ups in prices like what has happened over the past couple of years with molybdenum ($5 to $35/lb) and uranium ($10 to $30/ lb).


IPMG is an active exploration company whose strategic objective is to generate multiple returns on shareholders' investments through the acquisition, exploration and development of world-class mineral deposits. IPMG's commodity focus includes gold, copper, molybdenum, tungsten, titanium, coal and uranium. The company is in the process of assembling a portfolio of significant projects in the United States and overseas.


About us:

International Precious Minerals Group, Inc. is a mineral exploration company focusing on gold and other precious mineral deposits predominantly in Southeast Asia and Africa. International Precious Minerals Group, Inc. was established to build on the strong contacts and relationships our management and other team members have internationally. The Company is publicly traded under the ticker symbol IPMG (PK).

We are in the process of evaluating or signing joint ventures with other companies in South East Asia and Africa to give us access to gold and other precious mineral leases. These countries are extremely rich in mineral potential, and relatively untouched due to the recent political instability. We plan to expand our portfolio of leases, while mining economically viable properties from the beginning.

Forward-Looking Statements:

This press release may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the "safe harbor" provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements are based on the current expectations of the management of IPMG only, and are subject to a number of factors and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements. Factors which could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, factors detailed in the Company's Securities and Exchange Commission filings; economic downturns affecting the operations of the Company, adequate financing to achieve the new strategic plans, and the unavailability of general financing to complete management's overall plans and objectives. IPMG undertakes no obligation to publicly release any revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. For a more detailed description of the risk and uncertainties affecting IPMG, reference is made to IPMG's reports filed from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission. www.ipminerals.com

This news release was distributed by PrimeZone,
www.primezone.com

SOURCE: International Precious Minerals Group, Inc.

By Staff

CONTACT:
Premier Funding
Kelly Black or Heather Kerwin
(480) 588 8658 or(480) 649-8224

Or write to info@ipminerals.com for Press Release IPMG





_________________________________________________

Friday, February 24, 2006

[GCHR]: Prediction from the_worm06

.
.
Prediction from the_worm06 Research Department:

the_worm06 predicts that GCHR will be RESTATING its financial statements filed with the SEC for the periods ending Dec. 31, 2004, March 31, 2005 and June 30, 2005. The corresponding 10-Q's for the same periods will be amended and refiled with the SEC.




__________________________________________________

Mr. Pumpy

.
.

http://snipurl.com/mtjy

This is my second request.

There will not be a third request.

regards,

the_worm06



______________________________________________

Thursday, February 23, 2006

[PLNI] Talk of the Reverse Split

.
.
http://ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=PLNI&read=45909


By: kempoma
23 Feb 2006, 10:39 PM EST
Msg. 45909 of 45919
(This msg. is a reply to 45836 by aquidneck_islander.)
Jump to msg. #

I felt like you a long time ago but when you hear any day now since 7/04 (not 2005 but 2004) you get tired of it. I bought in because of the MYSTERIOUS AUDIT back then and have been strung along. Nov of 2004 it was just about complete as per a PR from JT only to find out it wasn't even started. Now if anyone questions anything we get attacked and called bashers from longs who are only here 10 months because they are either paid co shills or just plain stupid closing their eyes on everything making excuses foe an idiot CEO. The best part of it all for me is i made money on this with an avg pps of .0039 and sold on the run at .016 avg. Im pissed because this co has a great chance but bozo the clown is going to destroy it. This could have been that once of a lifetime stock for many of us and now its any other pink. Mark this post because with all the new shrs issued JT will have no choice but to do a reverse split, it may be awhile but it will happen. GLTU



_____________________________________________

"I cannot support what I know to be false"

.
.
Save this post by Mr. Pumpy the Promoter for future reference.


http://ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=PLNI&read=45740


By: rrm_b4u
23 Feb 2006, 05:10 PM EST
Msg. 45740 of 45821
(This msg. is a reply to 45729 by plnicheerleader.)
Jump to msg. #

PLC... The truth is the truth.

I blindsided no one. Do your DD and you find that the IPO was at $21. To argue otherwise is foolish since any investor that lived through the IPO of microsoft as I did knows the truth.

I do appreciate your support. But I cannot support what I know to be false.

rrm

- - - - -



__________________________________________________

The definition of a Stock Promoter explained

.
.
The definition of a stock promoter. The statements below are so clear, that a narrative is not needed and Mr. Pumpy does mean every word he said. (see bold underline below).

Apparently Mr. Pumpy believes that the stock message boards are only to pump and hype the stocks in order to influence the stock price positively. Discussion of the negative aspects of a company, or even questions, are not allowed if they are not positive, no matter how important they might be.

There is something very very wrong with this person's thinking.


http://ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=PLNI&read=45423


By: rrm_b4u
23 Feb 2006, 01:07 PM EST
Msg. 45423 of 45467
(This msg. is a reply to 45412 by SHAD_07503.)
Jump to msg. #

Your reaction to my post CONFIRMS to me that you are part of the bash crew involved here. No one would have such a detached reaction to being called a slime ball, except one engaged in disinformation.

I recall you telling us you flipped out and only had a small position. So when did you flip again and reload? Flipping sure does load the money boad... eh Shad?

Today you hate your money (investment)??? BS... anyone with their own real money invested here knows very well that losses create motivation to make the stock perform better, not worse. You never talk down a stock you are long in... period.

You are quite mistaken SHAD... I DO mean every word.

- - - - -



_________________________________________________

Wednesday, February 22, 2006

An attempt to prove a show of strength backfires on Mr. Pumpy the Promoter

.
.
An attempt to prove a show of strength for so-called "strong longs" backfires on Mr. Pumpy the Promoter. In the Raging Bull posted message below, Mr. Pumpy listed 17 individuals that he labeled "straight up longs" of PLNI stock.

What is wrong with this picture?

It seems that Mr. Pumpy did not include the name of jmhollen, the main promoter for PLNI and a "good friend" of Mr. Pumpy, unless, of course, one of the 17 aliases listed by Mr. Pumpy is one used by Mr. Hollen. Maybe Mr. Pumpy finally read the report published by the_worm06 Research Department on this blog describing the 3.5 million PLNI shares sold into the market by Mr. Hollen, while he was pumping and hyping the PLNI stock (http://snipurl.com/kwrs). Some of jmhollen's past relationships are described here: http://snipurl.com/mui9 and http://snipurl.com/mui8.

In addition, several of the 17 aliases have been consistently selling their PLNI shares, either by selling a majority during the recent months (as many as 25 million shares just in February alone), or by "swing trading" every week since the beginning of summer 2005.

The bold italic descriptions below have been added to Mr. Pumpy's posted message to describe the known instances in which individuals have been selling shares into the market. These are only the "known" sales, but how many more of these 17 people have also been "swing trading" the PLNI stock? - after all, Mr. Pumpy is known for his TA analysis of stocks, which is often used for short term trading.

How sad. How very sad indeed!


http://ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=PLNI&read=45176


By: rrm_b4u
22 Feb 2006, 08:36 PM EST
Msg. 45176 of 45216
(This msg. is a reply to 45166 by plnicheerleader.)
Jump to msg. #

After 8 months of incessant bashing, alias changes, and skin shedders, the strong longs here really don't know who to trust. I can tell you this... the following aliases are straight up longs (who may flip a few shares at times for profit) IMO.

Downdraft

Chopper - Admitted to flipping the stock all along.

GreenbayPackers - Admitted to selling 15 million shares into the market in one day in February, 2006.

Woogie_down - Admitted to selling a majority of his shares at least five times since July 2005.

neztime

near_survivor - Admitted to selling shares during the month of January 2006.

designengr - Admitted to selling 2 million of his 3 million shares in the last 2 months.

bullishforplni0 - Admitted to selling all of his 10 million shares on February 2nd and 3rd, 2006.

jack47wd

Molson_Ice

off2theraces

KG4

seapick

oldno7

bones712

popajay

bearclaw - Admitted to "swing-trading" PLNI shares by seling several times per week since May 2005.

There are others I've left off the list I'm sure.

If you are long and have questions of the above longs or issue with them, then you need to reevaluate that. Start fresh and understand the unique place you've dropped into.

rrm

(Voluntary Disclosure: Position- Long; ST Rating- Hold; LT Rating- Hold)



_____________________________________________________

Mr. Pumpy the Promoter begins to remove information from the message boards

.
.
http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=22193626


To: SI Admin (Dave) who wrote (4335)
2/22/2006 1:24:59 PM
From: rrm_bcnu
Read Replies (1) of 4351

SI DAVE... When my subscription expired my personal information suddenly returned to my profile. Please remove all my personal information from my profile immediately. A legal issue. Thank you.

Rick




________________________________________________

jmhollen and Mr. Pumpy the Promoter

.
.
What is the true relationship between jmhollen and Mr. Pumpy the Promoter?





detailed review and comments on this topic to follow




________________________________________________

jmhollen and convicted fraudster Thomas S. Hughes

.
.
jmhollen as a business associate of Thomas S. Hughes and promoter of Hughes' company eConnect, Inc.

http://snipurl.com/lb0a




Thomas S. Hughes convicted of securities fraud and sentenced to over 8 years in federal prison:

http://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/lr18620.htm




EXCELLENCE IN RESEARCH ?




_______________________________________________

jmhollen and convicted fraudster Larry Stockett

.
.
jmhollen protecting Larry Stockett on the message boards:

http://www.siliconinvestor.com/subject.aspx?subjectid=5495


and some comments about Larry Stockett by jmhollen:

http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=11527046





Larry Stockett convicted of securities and wire fraud:

http://snipurl.com/ie5c



EXCELLENCE IN RESEARCH ?




___________________________________________________

Tuesday, February 21, 2006

Mr. Pumpy

.
.

Mr. Pumpy

Please provide your contact details for service of summons and service of subpoena, including other members of your household that can access your computer.


regards,

the_worm06



_______________________________________________

Monday, February 20, 2006

To be published after 9:30 am EST, Tuesday, February 21, 2006

.
.

http://snipurl.com/mqsz




___________________________________________

Sunday, February 19, 2006

Release of Company name for Special Report by the_worm06 Research Department

.
.
The name of the Company that will be covered in the Special Report to be published by the_worm06 Research Department mentioned previously:

http://snipurl.com/moyg


is:
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Golden Chief Resources, Inc
symbol: GCHR


__________________________________________

[GCHR]: Stock Price Projection

.
.
GCHR Stock Price Projection by the_worm06:



$0.005 (one-half penny)



(Closing stock price as of Friday, Feb. 17, 2006 was $0.05 (five cents))


___________________________________________

[GCHR]: Save this Post

.
.
Save the post below by the promoter jmhollen for the
same reasons mentioned here: http://snipurl.com/mqre

To show a small example of the false statments that this promoter, jmhollen, issues publicly as fact in his pumping and hyping messages, one has to look no further than his posted message below where he states that the_worm06 is "...as grossly ignorant as he is blatantly stupid. All the staff at CGHR is new, and the whole effort for the last 9+ months is new...". To prove that his statement on all the company staff being new is blantantly false, one can first start by revieing a recent posted message on Silicon Investor by the same promoter jmhollen, which includes a press release with the contact person being "Golden Chief Resources, Inc., Lewisville Mike McIlvain, 972-219-8585"(http://snipurl.com/mqs2) .

The latest 10-Q filed with the SEC by GCHR (June 2005) lists the same M.H. McIlvain, as President and CFO. Mr. McIlvain is also listed as the President & CFO in the March 2005 and Dec. 2004 10-Q's. Mr. McIlvain is again listed as Executive Vice President, Director and major stockholder in the 10-K's filed with the SEC by the Company for the years ending Sept. 2004, 2003, 2002, 2001, 2000 and 1999. So the President of the Company has been a senior officer and Director since 1999. Nothing else needs to be said regarding the credibility of the promoter jmhollen's statements. This is particularly important because GCHR has been operating with a minimal staff. Why he is lying in this simple posted message about the staff of GCHR remains to be seen.


http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=22185133

To: Creede Bighorns who wrote (4014)
2/20/2006 12:16:33 AM
From: jmhollen
of 4018

O/T: If that member of the Brothers Tweedle is bashing GCHR, he's as grossly ignorant as he is blatantly stupid. All the staff at GCHR is new, and the whole effort for the last 9+ months is new; even if it was delayed a little by the FL and LA hurricanes. Their prime mover, Fred Oden, is a 'on-call' FEMA person and he was called away to help with the recovery efforts in Flordia for several months . GCHR has brought at least three wells on line just recently, they have more wells yet to clean up and reconnect, and there's lots of property on their proven leases still to be drilled. Injecting natural gas back into the strata below the known oil deposits will also improve the flow in all their wells. The company will be applying for restoration to the OTCBB shortly. You'll note that Fred and crew have also been nice enough to provide us with RTQs while they are on the Pinks, and they will be picking up more friendly market makers soon as well.

American oil, for American consumers, being recovered by an American company sounds like a red, white & blue "..yaa-hoo.." to me. The contrarians are obviously a bunch of world class blockheads.

Oh well. Both PLNI and GCHR will make a total asses out of the sputtering doom-n'-gloomers, so we might as well sit back and enjoy the show while counting out profits. ..ACHI will follow soon.

John :-)



___________________________________________________

[GCHR]: Save these Posts

.
.
Save these posts from the Silicon Investor message board for when further research by the_worm06 Research Department is published on GCHR. These two individuals are the moderators for the GCHR Ihub message board. jmhollen is the moderator for the same board on Silicon Investor. It is unfortunate that these three individuals would pump and hype GCHR without doing the proper due diligence. Very unfortunate for the investors that have been suckered into owning GCHR by these 3 individuals - rrufff, Creede Bighorns and jmhollen - leading to significant losses for innocent investors in the weeks and months to come.

very unfortunate indeed.

post #1
http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=22184971

To: rrufff who wrote (3993)
2/19/2006 10:21:40 PM
From: Creede Bighorns
of 4014

rrufff-

another excellent post. You always seem to be able to get to the heart of things. I think it's very honorable of you to step forth and essentially draw some of the fire from rick and john. I think your intervention has also shown that the "blogger" is only operating out of contempt. He has littered his blog with so many attacks that it has become obvious to me that he's not trying to help follow investors. His bashing is more about personal vendettas. At first, it seemed as though he was just trying to get his DD out in the public eye, and then he was snuffed from communicating. Now it's become clear that actually he is just full of malice towards rick, jm, and now you. This is made clear because he is attacking GCHR essentially because you are in it. He's doing this while disregarding the fact that I'm the moderator of the GCHR thread on IHUB. He has said on his blog that "i'm alright in his book", but then letting his rage drive him to bash a stock on information that is almost a decade old. He doesn't seem to care that he may be hurting me, and many others that he doesn't think about. Of course, ironically, I believe in the case of GCHR he is doing nothing but help, since it is just now being discovered, and it's shareholder base is relatively small. His posting and reposting is no doubt shining the spot light on GCHR like never before. Anyone that takes a look at GCHR will see that they are 100% filing and 100% transparent, and therefore, of high value in such dangerous waters.

GodBless-ND
cris


============================


post #2
http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=22185003


To: Creede Bighorns who wrote (4014)
2/19/2006 10:36:49 PM
From: rrufff
of 4015

Excellent DD Creede per usual. I agree except that I don't think this blogger creates enough attention to draw anyone to or from GCHR. The only reason there was any effect, if any, on PLNI, was because he was cited by some of the bashers.

I do think, that all but the least objective, will now realize that the value of this "research department" is less than nil. He's been exposed as impotent, possibly an NASD violator, and clearly motivated by his own personal embarrassment.

I was semi-joking when I called him a contra-indicator in PLNI, but, interestingly enough, it may very well be true. As others understand that the string of bashing relies on a "research department" that is nothing more than one goofy ancient guy with a vendetta, then the whole charade of bashing falls, absent some real factual data that would need to be verified elsewhere.

I think there's a good chance that his next target may be an immediate buy. But, all kidding aside, discredited by his lack of objectivity, I doubt anyone will ever take him seriously again.

ROFLMAO.


_________________________________________________

[PLNI]: Did Plasticon issue another misleading press release about Pro Mold, Inc.?

.
.
Did Plasticon issue another misleading press release about Pro Mold, Inc.?


1. In a press release issued on October 26, 2005, PLNI stated that:

http://www.marketwire.com/mw/release_html_b1?release_id=99198
"Increased Demand for ProMold, Inc. Products Leads to $1 Million Backlog of Orders
After Completing the Acquisition of ProMold, Inc. on November 9, Plasticon Will Begin a 6 Day Per Week, 24 Hour Per Day Production Cycle to Meet Demand"



2. So PLNI stated that it "will begin a 6 day per week, 24 hour per day production cycle to meet demand".



3. The statement about beginning a full capacity production cycle seems to be misleading in view of what the Pro Mold, Inc. website was already stating during 2005, before the announcement of the Pro Mold acquisition by PLNI. It seems that Pro Mold was already operating at the full capacity production cycle:

http://snipurl.com/mqj7
"PRO MOLD, INC. is a custom plastic injection molder of thermoplastic materials, operating seven modern presses in a thirty thousand square foot facility in St. Louis County. The plant operates around the clock, six days per week."




____________________________________________

Mr. Paul Davis: "I'm not going to bash a penny stock with obvious and generic issues. I'll leave that for the bashers."

.
.
"I'm not going to bash a penny stock with obvious and generic issues. I'll leave that for the bashers."


This is what Mr. Paul Davis stated recently in the Silicon Investor message board (http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=22171773).

Is this a true statement?

To answer the question, one only has to review one of the more vicious and disgusting attacks on a penny stock and an innocent investor in recent history. Why attack and make fun of the integrity of this investor? The only thing that the innocent investor did wrong was to have the misfortune of losing money on two penny stock investments, one of which he claimed he was misled by management. This is what the attacker says at the end:

"And you had the nerve to bash other stocks. Have you learned a lesson yet?"


Who is the individual that made these vicious attacks?...none other than Mr. Paul Davis, the former attorney from the eastern suburbs of Boston.

Below you will find Mr. Davis' (rrufff) vicious attacks, including much name calling and personal insults:


From: rrufff:

http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=22172128
"Would you like to discuss dilution, toxic funding and broken promises on EFCR, pal?Let's start shall we!!"



http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=22172163
"But EFCR falls into the category of promise and nothing else. You have nothing there, other than toxic funding and dilution. Shall we explore it. You call this a real company? "prepare to negotiate".shall we prepare to negotiate? all sing, "Prepare to negotiate."What kind of fool are you? First a pumper of PLNI and then a a basher?"


http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=22172167
"EFCR filings - a story of dilution. How the frick do you think you're ever going to get a sustained rise on this POS if you have this as an overhang?"


http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=22172178
"Just giving it in little pieces for you so even you understand what you have fallen in love with.EFCR is a diluter's dream. You'll never get a sustained rally with this"


http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=22172180
"Damn - EFCR is a basher's dream. I really hate doing this, but since you have decided to squat here and bash a real company like COVAD, here goes"


http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=22172186
"EFCR - you will buy any POS and then change your mind and become a basher."


http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=22172192
"Libya - gonna make you rich with EFCR?LOLOLOLOLThis bashing game is getting kind of fun"


http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=22172203
"Looks like EFCR has the ole paid pumpers.$17,000 for a crappy website mention.Would you like to predict the date of the r/s for EFCR?"


http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=22172208
"Look at what EFCR started with when it was first mentioned on Jed's board and look at the fully diluted now after the toxics.You'll never see anything because 3 billion will be r/s.EFCR is the company you are pumping? Get off the COVAD board with your crap pump of EFCRROFLMAO"


http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=22172224
"What an idiot you are.EFCR was .20 range in July and it is now at .03 and falling soon to the next decimal point.and you want to bash covad?What a moron."


http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=22172232
"Aren't you one of the PLNI bashers who complained about "promises to negotiate?" promise for this, promise for that?Any penny stock can be bashed and EFCR is a real POS with huge bashing potential.Take a look at this PR. KazakhstanLibya stability LOLhttp://biz.yahoo.com/bw/051206/20051206005194.html?.v=1
No details - it's a joke - they talk about the field - in which they may have a MOU one day, maybe even some oil.SHOW US THE OIL YOU IDIOT"


http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=22172383
"I was just sick of moronic posts OT about penny stocks from a basher who bashes after selling at a loss.The whole premise of comparing a penny stock to this one is absurd.The guy doesn't even do a drop of DD, just runs with the crowd and so far, just on this board is 0 for 3 in his picks."


http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=22176676
"LOL - how's that EFCR????Did you say it was in the TIMBERRRRRRRRRRRR business?"


http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=22176683
"No, but you're posting about value on a stock EFCR, that you have no idea how many billion shares that will be issued fully diluted. LOL"


http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=22176692
"You, on the other hand, throw your money away on a POS like EFCR, even though you have no idea as to the number of shares the company has or will have given the filings and indications of massive dilution."


http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=22172234
"Anyone have the number of shares fully diluted after all the toxic convertibles? What's with all the shares issued for services on recent Forms 4?"


http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=22172244
"Seriously, how can you invest or even gamble when you have no clue as to the capital structure here?It's one thing not to know if they will ever have any oil.You have some basics on which to start"


http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=22172250
"Am I reading those Forms 4 right? millions and millions of shares "for services?"Do you think they should be rewarded for shares "for services" when the stock price has been tanking?"


http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=22172256
"Wow - just because shareholders suffer doesn't mean the insiders should.Looks like the insiders think this is worth no more than .025Reduce the price for them. Get 'em cheap."


http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=22172264
"Do you know what a toxic share structure is?Looks like there is no way to figure out how many shares you'll be competing with in your "gamble."Good faith estimate means - lots of shares each time they do a new registration. Can you say "billions"?this SB-2 is based on .053 and, of course, the stock has tanked about in 1/2 from that."


http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=22172270
"How can you gamble on just faith?There is nothing here but share issuance.Seriously, you have the nerve to bash another stock?Have you looked at the revenue or should I say "expense" statement?There is nothing here yet, other than a dream, a promise and you have the fricken nerve to bash other stocks?"


http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=22172284
"Read the filings, pal. They are not going to get to any oil, 10 wells online, before the r/s. That's my opinion, but they can't keep going like this and losing shareholder support.You see that Jed, one of the most loyal shareholders, seems to have given up. I feel badly for him.Believe me, this is not pleasant to show you the errors of your ways. You're not even gambling. You're just throwing your money away.And you had the nerve to bash other stocks.Have you learned a lesson yet?"


http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=22172296
"If you're gonna be a basher, you have to be really slimey and use the old businesses.How about that yacht business?Can you trust a company that goes from one business to another?Then take a look at the big international company they "acquired" with all those initial shares.Any oil? NOPE - Here's what they say they do - Talk about your BS - hope, wing and a prayer.. Yet, they give away shares and lower conversions and strike prices to insiders"


http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=22172307
"Got any equity?Do you know what it means when a company has "NEGATIVE EQUITY."Do you like reading that equity has increased? How about NEGATIVE equity?"


http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=22172316
"They have nothing yet. No oil.You can't even figure out the fully diluted shares.OK - now let's assume you are correct and they start getting wells online. How do you pay for production? Yup - more shares.Let's see, do you need $500,000 to get things going? Given the dumping, I doubt the share price will be .01, but even at .02 is another 25 million shares that will have to be dumped. Right?Who is going to buy these shares given the history.These posts are all my opinion and based on the filings, but I just dont' see how the business plan works given the current corporate structure.Sorry."


http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=22172329
"This is your statement. It makes no sense. It's like buying a car and saying you don't care if it costs $50,000 or $100,000 because if you get to drive it for awhile, you'll go back to the dealer and ask him to reduce the price.You ARE dreaming. They are not going to give you back anything.They've been taking care of themselves, all the while the share price has been tanking. More shares. Lower conversion prices, lower strike prices.Are you seeing a pattern yet?It all translates into a tanking stock.THAT'S WHY THE STOCK PRICE IS TANKING!!!!"


http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=22172337
"Do you seriously think that you'll be cashing out at a dollar?What will the company be worth then? Pick a number of fully diluted shares - how many billionsx $1 and you're going to be pretty close to the biggest oil companies in the world.You and I both know that the solution is going to be reducing shares. If you think they are going to cut their shares, you are in "la la" land. Instead, you will likely see the proverbial and dreaded r/s.It's called screwing your shareholders."


http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=22172355
"Hey - despite all this, it's just my opinion that you will never make anything, and will most likely lose everything in EFCR.The only reason I did this exercise because you had the nerve to moronically and generically bash Covad and PLNI. You know nothing about investing. You go along with the crowd. YOu fell in love with PLNI, announced that COVad was crap.Then when the bashers came over to PLNI, you turned into a basher.Then you jumped onto EFCR, apparently w/o doing any research on it. You have a "wing and a prayer" that you will be saved with 10 wells. Pray, baby, pray.Not once did you have an original idea of your own.Get real - get informed - do some DD and you may even make some money some day instead of just trying to tear down other people's stocks.I hope longs here make money. I showed you that any stock can be bashed. But if you are going to do it, at least be effective and do your homework.They don't make good bashers these days.ROFLMAO"


http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=22172378
"Man, are you thick? I have no problem with penny stocks. I do DD 18 hours a day.You get into stocks and all you know is perhaps what industry it's in and that other people - capt or Jed - like it. Then when the bashers come in, you flee and then start pumping a new one.Weren't you the one that overheard some secret conversation on PLNI on the airline or something?Don't make me go find the post.Look if you're not going to do any real work, skip the wiseass posts about how badly Covad is doing AFTER you sell at a loss and then start posting OT about some new hairbraned scheme you have, first PLNI and then EFCR, which IMO is the worst of all 3."


http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=22172431
"Aren't you impressed with yourself?What do you think will happen with the 650 million shares that will have to be dumped here to pay for those wells, or should I say alleged wells?Whose gonna buy those shares?"


http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=22172455
"BTW - I'm not in PLNI and never was but I just thought you looked so ridiculous pumping it because you overheard a secret conversation on a plane and then bashing it and then falling in love with this penny stock after equally effective DD.And yes, I expect that the 650 million plus the current count to be only the start. How about a little bet that the share structure hits a billion shares OR there is a r/s on EFCR? I assume by now that you have taken a little peek at the filings and realize that when you look at all the preferreds, the convertibles, the warrants, the options and see the TOXIC nature of the convertibles, that billions of shares are likely in the future?Free and discounted shares for all, ooops I mean insiders."


http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=22176681
"Seriously, you are writing opinions that relate to value and you have absolutely no clue as to how many shares this company has, how much will be fully diluted now or in the near future, considering the preferreds, the convertibles, the options and the warrants."


http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=22176686
"Can we hear a flushing sound? Is that the gas? Is this your best pump?"


http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=22176699
"I'm not bashing - just asking how you can pump a stock and have no idea what the fully diluted shares will be.Have you actually read the filings?I hope you buy some more. I'd like to see Jed get a better price on his shares."



______________________________________________

Saturday, February 18, 2006

[PLNI]: Mr. Pumpy the Promoter has some explaining to do

.
.
In the series of posted messages below you can see that Mr. Pumpy the Paid Promoter has lied about his sale of PLNI shares.

What else is new?

Has he been selling his PLNI shares all along, just like his fellow "longs" who have been swing trading the stock?



http://ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=PLNI&read=35150
By: rrm_b4u
27 Jan 2006, 10:29 AM EST

"Haven't sold a single share since July 11, 2005. "



http://ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=PLNI&read=35190&submit=Go
By: rrm_b4u
27 Jan 2006, 10:58 AM EST

"I sold 100K on the 11th of July"



http://ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=PLNI&read=42857&submit=Go
By: rrm_b4u
15 Feb 2006, 01:30 PM EST

"bought 100K on 7/11 and sold on 7/27. All buys since then."




______________________________________________

The Filing of False and Misleading Financial Statements with the Securities & Exchange Commission

.
.
There will be a Special Report published by the_worm06 Research Department titled:


"The Filing of False and Misleading Financial Statements with the Securities & Exchange Commission by (name of Public Company)"


1. The report will be published by Midnight, Saturday, February 18, 2006 PST.

2. The name of the public company will be released only at that time.

3. The only other piece of information that will be released beforehand is that two of the currently active promoters of the stock are rrufff and jmhollen.

4. Any questions? - feel free to use the "Comments" feature below.




________________________________________________

Friday, February 17, 2006

[GCHR]: rrufff - Excellence in Research and Due Diligence

.
.
Considering that GCHR is currently seeking private placement funds, one has to wonder why Mr. Paul Davis (rrufff), who is actively promoting GCHR, has never discussed or reviewed the following SEC litigation release and the involvement of certain GCHR officer(s) with BENEFUND, INC during the time in question:


http://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/lr15975.txt

"The Commission's complaint, filed on April 18, 1997, alleged that Twyman and others, in connection with sales of $2 million in BeneFund S-8 stock and a BeneFund private placement, and in press releases and Commission filings, made false and misleading statements concerning the use of investor funds, the value of BeneFund's assets and the future marketability of BeneFund stock. The complaint also alleged that Twyman orchestrated the public sale and distribution of S-8 stock in violation of the securities registration provisions."



Another example of the poor research and due diligence being conducted by Mr. Paul Davis (rrufff), who falsely prides himself as an expert in this area.

More examples of Mr. Davis' (rrufff) poor research skills regarding this company will be reported by the_worm06 Research Department in the near future.

Stay tuned.



_______________________________________________

[SVXP]: Mr. Paul Davis and SVXP

.
.
Was Mr. Paul Davis, the former attorney from the Eastern suburbs of Boston, involved in the SVXP fiasco?

http://snipurl.com/moin




details to follow




_______________________________________________

[SVXP]: The Fiasco at Sovereign Exploration Associates International, Inc

.
.
The fiasco at SVXP.

Was there a misinformation campaign designed to pump the price of the stock right before the 1000-1 reverse split?

What did the promoters know or not know about the massive increase in Authorized Common shares, by a factor of 100 times, to 250 billion shares?

What did the promoters know or not know about the massive increase in Common shares Issued and Outstanding by a factor of 5 times, to 2.3 billion shares?

Did the promoters purposely mislead the public with outdated Authorized and Outstanding SVXP common share amounts months after the more current, actual amounts were filed with the SEC?

What will a full review of the trading records of SVXP stock of these promoters show?

Was a similar misinformation campaign also carried out at PLNI by the same promoters?




details to follow



__________________________________________

Thursday, February 16, 2006

A brilliant way to find the non-scam companies

.
.
Brilliant!

KG4, the 42 year old colleague of promoters Mr. Pumpy, jmhollen and Paul Davis of Suburban Boston, has now figured out a way to determine whether a company is, or is not, a scam and therefore whether it is, or is not, going to be halted by the SEC.

According to this promoter, if a company pays a lot of money and attends a stock conference, it implies that it is not a scam and will therefore not be halted by the SEC.

Brilliant!

This shows how far these short term swing traders will go to justify the credibility of PLNI, after the company surprised everyone and issued 1.4 billion shares in 1 1/2 months after it publicly stated that it was in a share buyback program.


http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=9738260

Posted by: KG4
In reply to: fynley who wrote msg# 8302
Date:2/15/2006 5:59:29 PM
Post #of 8410

Not that this means anything, but since this company put out a PR on the 10th ( Money TV) stating that PLNI would be at the small expo conference on the 16th....I contacted them today and asked if PLNI was still slated to be there tomorrow......The answer I received was......YES

Take it for what it;s worth folks, which is not much....but, it looks like PLNI paid alot of money to be there....Why spend that kind of money if you were a scam and fixing to be halted by SEC? Food for thought...and at this point I am of the belief of many others, in that TUREK needs to step to the plate.....I suspect he will...I suspect there are many reasons for them 'being quiet'...but only time will tell.....I do wonder, that with the amount of bashing that has occured..the very concerted effort to harm plni...well, all this has made it's rounds...anybody looking at plni I must assume has seen all the postives and all the negatives....with bashers claiming so much 'negative', why is this stock not at .0002 and why are buyers ready to jump in above .005??

Rhetorical question with no responses necessary....

as always, buy and sell anything at your own risk and based on your own DD...

I am hoping for good things from PLNI...lets see how far 'hope' takes us up or down.....



___________________________________________

[GCHR]: What promoter rrufff REALLY thinks of companies like GCHR

.
.
To get an idea what the promoter rrufff really thinks of small energy stocks like GCHR, please read rrufff's posted messages on this Silicon Investor message board:

http://www.siliconinvestor.com/subject.aspx?subjectid=55624

Mr. Paul Davis' (from a Boston suburb) detailed comments on this company and how they relate to GCHR will be reviewed here in the near future.

The following quote from rrufff is an example of his comments. One can only wonder what would happen if this reasoning is applied to the 96 million GCHR shares received by two GCHR Directors for $95,000 in O&G leases - resulting in a valuation for the GCHR shares of $0.00099 per share :

"...Wow - just because shareholders suffer doesn't mean the insiders should.Looks like the insiders think this is worth no more than .025

Reduce the price for them. Get 'em cheap...."



details to follow




_____________________________________________

Wednesday, February 15, 2006

[PLNI]: "....you can't compare a real company to one like...PLNI"

.
.
It seems that one of Mr. Pumpy the Promoter and jmhollen's close associates isn't saying too many good things about PLNI. One could just see the abundant phone calls, emails and PM's being sent to Mr. Paul Davis. An apology from rrufff would be expected within the next day or two.

Why is this man bashing PLNI? He has already admitted that he does not own the stock and according to Mr. Pumpy the Promoter and jmhollen, one should not bash a stock that he doesn't own. Actually, they also say that one should not bash a stock that he owns.

Most people would say that PLNI is a real company. What was Mr. Paul Davis thinking?



http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=22172499
To: Captain James T. Kirk who wrote (10023)
2/16/2006 12:25:00 AM
From: rrufff
of 10025

That's exactly my point - you can't compare a real company to one like EFCR or PLNI. Not to denigrate penny stocks but they are different animals. A real investor or trader would realize that....



__________________________________________________

Mr. Paul Davis of Eastern Massachusetts

.
.
Who is Mr. Paul Davis of Eastern Massachusetts?


What is his relationship with Mr. Pumpy the Paid Promoter, KG4 and jmhollen?


It seems that this foursome know each other very well. Here is one of them admitting that they sell out the majority of their positions in stocks on the runups. Are short term traders the reason why PLNI continues to fall in price once it gets a decent runup? Is this what Mr. Purdy, the short term trader and a colleague of the four mentioned above, does in his "swing trading" of PLNI?

more on this later


To: jmhollen who wrote (2482)
12/31/2005 1:45:14 PM
From: KG4
of 2489

I will sell into strength, not dump...and will be sure to keep plenty of freebies.

Very hard to 'dump' a large amount of shares and get the price you want without whacking the bid way down.....so, like RRM, RRUFFF, you and others...I do sell and take profits as we move up, but never 'dump', and always try to keep as many freebies as I can depending on company and situation...


;>)









___________________________________________

[PLNI]: Mr. Pumpy the Paid Promoter attempts to justify the issuance of 1.4 billion shares in 1 1/2 months

.
.
Mr. Pumpy the Paid Promoter attempts to justify the issuance by PLNI of 1.4 billion common shares in the period of 1 1/2 months. During this same period the float increased by 1.7 billion common shares to 2.3 billion shares, almost 4 times the amount released by PLNI for December 7, 2005.

Mr. Pumpy forgets to mention that during this period PLNI had stated that it was in a share buyback mode. He also forgets to mention that PLNI had stated that the acquisitions in question (Pro Mold and Semco) would not cause the PLNI stockholders to be diluted. He forgets to mention that M&A attorneys fall under the category of M&A expenses already stated by him. Finally, he forgets to mention that PLNI has not closed the acquisitions.

Additionally, Mr. Pumpy discusses the high level of attorney expenses needed to fight off an evil bear raid. There was never a "bear raid". What are these attorney expenses for?...the cost of collecting message board posted messages? It is all in the imagination of Mr. Pumpy.

Mr. Pumpy the Paid Promoter is now reaching to the gutter in his failed attempts at justifying the way PLNI is doing business. When will he stop trying to mislead the public? Just recently Mr. Pumpy was caught misleading the public by stating that he had confirmed that PLNI would issue audited financial statements by February 14th (http://snipurl.com/mg4x and http://snipurl.com/mllf). February 14th came and went, yet PLNI failed to produce the audited financials - which is EXACTLY what the_worm06 had earlier predicted.

Sad. A very sad individual indeed.


http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=22170661

To: Creede Bighorns who wrote (192)
2/15/2006 3:30:33 PM
From: rrm_bcnu
193 of 193

Creede,

As I see your post being re-posted around the internet on every stock board by those identified with the Anthony@pacific guru-crowd I realise just how much ones inexperience can be used to promote the "grand revelation" correlary to the "I've Seen The Light" hypothesis.

I think you have made your point very clear. And although it would be very easy for me to take a neutral stance on the issues, I feel it important to make a single point and move on.

I realize that you have taken the position that PLNI's sale of shares is but another in a long list of stocks who are diluting and running. You may be right in saying that, and you may be totally off base. Your question about where the money was spent has yet to be determined in the case of PLNI. Yet, in your mind PLNI is tried, convicted, and now sentenced.

I am still uncertain that PLNI will clear up to your satisfaction the issues with respect to share issuance, but I can say that in any business...

1) Large capital hardware increases cost real money.
2) SOX Auditors cost real money.
3) SEC certified attorneys to work M&A and fight off a bear raid costs real money.
4) New business operations cost real money.
5) Merger and acquisition expenses cost real money.
6) New executive operations personnel cost real money.

In summary, mergers are not cheap. They cost serious money and require focus and dedication. The executive staff alone has tripled.

You are certainly entitled to your opinions. And as long as you voice those opinions in such a loud an demonstrable way, you will garner attention. It may not be the attention you desired, nor may it be positive. But your comments are now being touted as the grand revelation of the former believer.

I hope you are comfortable in that role, because should the PLNI management satisfactorily explain the reasoning for the share issuance, you will have a massive amount of crow to digest. As one who has eaten a large volume of crow due to PLNI I can tell you that it lacks taste and does not go down well.

GLTY

rrm



__________________________________________________

Tuesday, February 14, 2006

Mr. Pumpy the Paid Promoter, the legal threats and his continued lies

.
.

It seems that Mr. Pumpy the Paid Promoter has continued with his lies and false statements. Just today he stated that:

"It was they, not I, that threatened legal action."
http://ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=PLNI&read=42544


To see how far Mr. Pumpy the Paid Promoter is from the truth, one only has to review a sample of his posted messages on Raging Bull and Silicon Investor (going back to as early as December 1, 2005) where he is making serious legal threats to various individuals that are simply bringing out the truth about PLNI:


Dec. 1, 2005
"worm...You had better be able to back up your frivolous claim that I am a paid promoter or I will sue you."
http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=21933114


Dec. 1, 2005
"worm......but be advised that I am dead serious about watching any and all allegations you make about me. I'd as soon sue you as not, and I have both the funds and legal expertise to accomplish just that."
http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=21933135


Dec. 1, 2005
"shorts...If you would like to be included in this legal battle just keep it up. Otherwise my advice to you is to not perpetuate anything you cannot substantiate in court."
http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=21933138


Feb. 3, 2006
"Yes I will be part of a litigation to sue, and you can bet you will be identified in that suit. "
http://ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=PLNI&read=37761&submit=Go


Feb. 7, 2006
"Your threats just continue scionist. I hope you can back them up, cause if not I am going to sue you till your eyes cross."
http://ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=PLNI&read=39620&submit=Go


Feb. 8, 2006
"I would guess that only those who have been very stongly persecuted in an incessant, orchestrated campaign would have grounds for civil action. My lawyer is looking into it now."
http://ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=PLNI&read=40588&submit=Go


Feb. 10, 2006
"I have contacted my lawyer. He is receiving daily updates. You snicker because you are the one he really is grinning about. "
http://ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=PLNI&read=41416&submit=Go



One has to wonder whether Mr. Pumpy the Paid Promoter has copied his attorney with these legal threats.

A very sad individual...very sad indeed....




________________________________________________

Monday, February 13, 2006

Mr. Paul Davis

.
.
Who is Mr. Paul Davis?

Is he based in Massachusetts?

What is his relationship with Mr. Pumpy the Paid Promoter and jmhollen?



details to follow



__________________________________________________

A Reminder for Tuesday, Feb. 14, 2006

.
.
http://theworm06.blogspot.com/2006/02/plni-here-we-go-prediction-by.html




_____________________________________________________

Excellent Post by Creede Bighorns

.
.

http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=22162553



Creede, you are ok in my book

regards

the_worm06



____________________________________________

Sunday, February 12, 2006

Michael Cuzner-Charles - The Fallout Continues

.
.
"Little by Little
One by One
Day by Day
Week by Week
Month by Month
Year by Year
The Fallout Continues"


http://snipurl.com/mi0q

03 February - Disciplinary proceedings of the Professional Conduct Directorate



3. JULIAN MICHAEL CUZNER-CHARLES [FCA] of Hidden House, Kersley Hall Lane, Wilby Road, Stradbroke,

The Investigation Committee preferred the following formal complaint to a Disciplinary Tribunal of the Council at its meeting on 30 November 2005.

.
.
.
.
.
.
The Tribunal ordered that Julian Michael Cuzner-Charles be excluded from membership of the Institute.

__________________________________________




Saturday, February 11, 2006

[GCHR]: Research begins on Golden Chief Resources, Inc.

.
.

Due to the promotional efforts of jmhollen and rrufff, the_worm06 Research Department begins research on GCHR, Golden Chief Resources, Inc.

The following is an example of research to follow. Two Directors of GCHR paid themselves 96 million common shares of GCHR for oil & gas leases having a carry over value of only $95,000. These shares represent about 40% of outstanding common shares. The value of these 96 million shares at Friday's closing price of $0.04 is approximately $4 million :


http://www.secinfo.com/dUgwf.zG9.htm

Golden Chief Resources Inc · 10QSB · For 6/30/05
Filed On 9/26/05 4:02pm ET · SEC File 0-12809 ·
Accession Number 1000096-5-518

NOTE 2 - OIL AND GAS PROPERTIES PURCHASED FROM A RELATED PARTY

Golden Chief issued 96,000,000 shares of common stock to a company controlled by two directors of Golden Chief for the purchase of two oil and gas leases. The properties were recorded at the carry-over basis of the former owner totaling $95,000. The shares were valued at $960,000 resulting in an asset of $95,000 and compensation of $865,000. See footnote 4.



__________________________________________

[PLNI]: The "True Longs"?

.
.

There is a group of investors that claim that they are "true longs" of PLNI. One of these "true longs" in particular, Chopper, even claims that he visited the manufacturing facilities of Pro Mold, Inc., a company that is in the process of being acquired by PLNI, and posted a glowing review of the facilities : http://snipurl.com/mgob

In reality, it seems that this group of "true longs" are nothing but a bunch of short term traders and flippers, that attack anyone that posts truthful, but negative information on PLNI or simply asks questions.

In this posted message from allstocks.com, Chopper shows his true colors:


http://snipurl.com/mgoe


Chopper
posted
November 16, 2005 10:27 AM

State, you should have been flipping this like a lot of us did on the pr's. Made some bank and got more shares.


--------------------
It will run when you least expect it. :)


Posts: 914 From: NC Registered: Mar 2005




_______________________________________________

Friday, February 10, 2006

[PLNI]: Here we go: the Prediction by the_worm06

.
.

Contrary to what Mr. Pumpy the Paid Promoter is disseminating in message boards, as in the posted message from Raging Bull copied below,

the_worm06 predicts that:

PLNI will NOT file with the SEC their audited financials for the years 2003-2004 by February 14, 2006...

and

PLNI will NOT file with the SEC their 2005 audited financials by February 23, 2006.



Let's see who is correct:

Mr. Pumpy the Paid Promoter

or

the_worm06.


http://ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=PLNI&read=41762


By: rrm_b4u
11 Feb 2006, 12:13 AM EST
Msg. 41762 of 41762
(This msg. is a reply to 41760 by sloth97.)
Jump to msg. #

Nothing yet sloth. We are expecting 2003 and 2004 financials before the 14th, and 2005 financials before the 23rd.

rrm

(Voluntary Disclosure: Position- Long; ST Rating- Hold; LT Rating- Hold)




____________________________________________

[PLNI]: Another Mr. Pumpy the Promoter post to be saved

.
.

Save this post by Mr. Pumpy the Promoter for when PLNI issues the balance of the 5 billion authorized common shares. The closing stock price today was $0.0055.


"I would not be short PLNI for all the tea in China"


http://ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=PLNI&read=41686



By: rrm_b4u
10 Feb 2006, 08:34 PM EST
Msg. 41686 of 41687
(This msg. is a reply to 41683 by molson_ice1.)
Jump to msg. #

Molson:

Seems that we may go into both with financials. We knew that the 03/04 financials were coming soon...

I would not be short PLNI for all the tea in China.

rrm

(Voluntary Disclosure: Position- Long; ST Rating- Buy; LT Rating- Hold)



_________________________________________________

To be attended by the_worm06

.
.

http://ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=PLNI&read=41609




______________________________________________

[PLNI]: Mr. Pumpy the Promoter admits to receiving insider information through "back channels"

.
.
Did Mr. Pumpy the Promoter trade on this insider information?


http://ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=PLNI&read=25698


By: rrm_bn4u
12 Dec 2005, 03:42 PM EST
Msg. 25698 of 41497
(This msg. is a reply to 25685 by state7800.)
Jump to msg. #

state,

With all the organized efforst to short the stock, I did not expect Bill to send out a PR on the new numbers. I believe we have found out via back channels that the increased issuance were for purchase of two more Toyo IM machines for the ProMold facility to work off an ever increasing backlog of production orders. I did not receive a reply to my email, but given the rather tactless and non-diplomatic nature of the email I suspect I got what I asked for.

Here is what I think. I think that PLNI is about to blow the sock off those shorting the stock. I think they suspect that and have mustered "the crew" to keep the share price low while they buy up shares. almost 200M shares in the past three trading days. WHO IS BUYING ALL THIS PLNI STOCK AND WHY?

rrm

(Voluntary Disclosure: Position- Long; ST Rating- Strong Buy; LT Rating- Strong Buy)



______________________________________

William Monsalve

.
.

Who is William (Billy) Monsalve and what is his business relationship to this promoter?



http://theworm06.blogspot.com/2006/02/who-is-this-paid-promoter.html



details to follow




____________________________________________

Very Important Prediction by the_worm06

.
.

Very important prediction by the_worm06 to be made after the close of trading today.


regards,

the_worm06



_______________________________________________

[PLNI]: Post of the Week

.
.

Sometimes you have to sit back and review the situation in the overall scheme of things. This person has done that with a fresh thought about PLNI. To this date, this simple "thought" had not been mentioned on the many message boards that cover PLNI.

This says it all:

http://ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=PLNI&read=41153


By: sleepyhead_777
09 Feb 2006, 11:28 PM EST
Msg. 41153 of 41363
Jump to msg. #

This is my first post. I have been lurking for awhile. I bought this stock at its high(.019). Haven’t sold a share so far. One thing that concerns me about financial/audit numbers being released is that if they thought that there was going to be a good reaction to the numbers why would they sell so many shares before they release the numbers? Any ideas?



_______________________________________

Thursday, February 09, 2006

Who is this Paid Promoter?

.
.

Who is this Paid Promtoer?

Under what aliases has he posted in the message boards during the last 5 years?

Who has paid him to promote their stocks?

Has he gotten paid by cash or stock, or both?

Has he been an employee or consultant, or both, to the companies that have paid him to promote their stocks?

What are the names of these companies?

Who has paid this person to issue death threats and harass individuals who ask questions about certain stocks?

Who is the company executive that has been sending him emails to post on message boards during the past 5 years that harass and threaten the lifes of innocent US Citizens?



http://snipurl.com/me85




details to follow



_______________________________________________

Cdoor Corp.

.
.

Research by the_worm06 Research Department will now begin on:


Cdoor Corp.


http://www.secinfo.com/d12TC3.v3Ne.htm


details to follow, including the relationships of the two founding Directors with other companies and individuals in several countries.




_________________________________________

A message for plniwillfly0

.
.

A message for plniwillfly0 (aka bullishforplni aka iwannaride0):

Together with Mr. Pumpy, I would strongly recommend that you retain an attorney. Accusing a known identity of being a well known felon is very significant libel.


http://ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=PLNI&read=40958


by the way, why is it that you haven't told your fellow "longs" that you have sold your entire 10 million shares of PLNI during the last month?




___________________________________________

[PLNI]: The Information Required by Pinksheets.com

.
.
According to Pinksheets.com, this information is imputed directly into the Pinksheets.com website by the company in question. It does not get sent to Pinksheets.com to be further added to the website. The only data that gets "sent" to Pinksheets is the application to open an account to be able to input the information into the website by the company.

As mentioned below in the Pinksheets.com website, the following is the informtion requiered:

Click this link for the pdf file:

Guideline for Providing Adequate Current Information Pursuant to Rule 15c2-11





http://www.pinksheets.com/otcguide/issuers_index.jsp

When Does an Issuer Need to Provide Adequate Current Information to the Public?
Pink Sheets believes adequate current information must be publicly available when an issuer's securities are traded in the OTC secondary markets under the following circumstances:

-At the time of initial quotation in public markets;

-At any time corporate insiders or other affiliates of the issuer are offering, buying or selling the issuer's securities in the OTC market;

-During any period when a security is the subject of ongoing promotional activities having the effect of encouraging trading of the issuer’s securities in the OTC market; or

-At the time securities initially sold in a private placement become freely tradeable in the OTC market.


If any of the the four above situations are occurring, issuers subject to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 must be current in their reporting obligations to the SEC and if an issuer is not required to be SEC reporting, we provide the Pink Sheets News Service for those non SEC reporting issuers to make their information publicly available.

Pink Sheets has created Guideline for Providing Adequate Current Information Pursuant to Rule 15c2-11 (pdf) to help OTC traded issuers to understand what information they are required to provide to the public.

As a matter of policy Pink Sheets will not publish quotations on www.pinksheets.com for any security when it has come to the attention of Pink Sheets that the security is the subject of ongoing promotional activities and adequate current information concerning the issuer is not publicly available. Pink Sheets will not resume publication of quotations for such securities unless and until it receives a legal opinion, in form and substance acceptable to Pink Sheets, to the effect that adequate current information is publicly available concerning the issuer and the security and the information has been posted on the Pink Sheets News Service. See Pink Sheets Letter to Attorneys Providing Opinions with Respect to Promoted Securities (PDF).




_________________________________________________